The Window.net

From Issue: 22 March 2007 | Today:



Shouting the Wind

 

Margaret Shalma

Chairperson SFBA

 

Shane O’Dowd-Rutherford

SFBA Media and Outreach

 

Disabled students must be heard at this critical time. With the major re-structuring of student services and programs to enhance the student experience, the voices of all the stakeholders are essential. Students For Barrier Free Access (SFBA), the only cross-disability advocacy group on campus, has many concerns about the lack of clarity of the free-flow of information given to us and about how the needs of disabled students will be addressed within the new framework. It is unacceptable that the latest committee struck to look at these issues does not include any student representation. Students with disabilities are not currently involved in the process; they are informed after the fact, which needs to change.

 

As it stands now, Accessibility Services is grouped under the cluster of “Health Programs and Services” within the new framework. It is grouped with services like psychiatric services, health services, counselling and learning skills. This concerns SFBA, as disabled students are perceived by the university as students who are in need of services by medical professionals exclusively, with the underlying assumption that we need to be fixed, rehabilitated and cured. We at Students for Barrier Free Access advocate a paradigm shift away from strictly placing disabled students in the health/medical realm. We would like to see the university commit to the development of a disabled community on campus, by addressing issues in the social realm such as affordable accessible housing on campus and resources for accessible extra- and co-curricular activities.

 

We envision the development of a centralized office addressing the holistic needs of the community and working on community development ensuring that students with disabilities feel welcome and included at the university. Some people may view this step as taking the onus away from the university at large to address accessibility issues for persons with disabilities. However, when viewing the university as a microcosm of society as a whole, it is essential to have strong advocacy for equity issues. The development of such a centre for advocacy for community support does not alleviate the university’s responsibility to address these issues on a daily basis; this centre would ultimately act as a resource, and support the process of integrating issues of diversity into the larger university community, producing a setting where community members not only address these issues but also understand them. We at Students for Barrier Free Access feel that this is a critical juncture where the university must commit to open-dialogue and show its dedication to disabled students by offering us a place at the table.

 

Return to Perspectives

 

 

Return to Front Page



 

 


Copyright © 2004-2007 The Window. All Rights Reserved.