The Window.net

From Issue: 20 February 2007 | Today:



Free Music – I Choo Choo Choose You

 

Why Lars Ulrich Needs a Valentine

 

Kate Burke

 

A job in the music industry and a penchant for downloading music is a fine balancing act. People who work for the big studios don’t like direct contact with those they accuse of draining their funding. In fact, in my experience as the humble employee, they don’t like much contact with regular people at all. The same can be said for many in the upper echelon of the music labels. In a business based on segregation of the famous and talented from the homely and plain, the shock that came with illegal downloading was not that the industry didn’t have its finger on the pulse of its market. The shock was that they feigned an interest in the customer in the first place.

 

For the past thirty years the music industry has been a business about money. Image came second, talent a distant third. It is no wonder that the contented music giant could not be bothered until it was money that he began to lose. Prod him with the stick of vacuous pop music, and he’ll grunt and roll over; give him a whiff of P2P networks and the angry beast awakens ready for battle.

 

Since Napster was shut down seven years ago, the music industry has lumbered through lawsuit after lawsuit attempting to reclaim the artists’ integrity. Which, surprisingly, is represented by money. With a few vocal celebrities on their side (hello, Lars), those in the biz came out swinging against the very people who support music in the first place. Lawsuits against programs that allowed file sharing grew into lawsuits against the people sharing the files. Record sales dropped drastically, causing a slump in the industry. It’s an odd consequence that as the music industry rallied against the general public, the general public stopped buying CDs. Huh.

 

Consider the facts. Over the past thirty years the industry has seen two, potentially three, profitable format changes (vinyl to 8-track to compact cassette to compact disc) that have forced the music buying public to repeatedly overhaul their library and invest further cash in the same material. It doesn’t matter how great Pink Floyd is, no one needs four copies of Dark Side of the Moon. Outside of relatively minute production costs, these technological improvements brought pure profit to the companies behind them.

 

What’s more, the music trends of the past thirty years have been questionable at best. With the advent of music channels such as MTV and MuchMusic, image began to trump talent. The bulk of what entered mainstream music, whether it was the hair metal and Europop of the eighties, pop craze of the nineties or the recent appropriation of the punk rock genre, it was manufactured by those in charge. Not only that (for that trend isn’t new), it wasn’t even good. Gone were the days of the respected album. The full length recording became a vehicle for singles alone. A vehicle for further profit.

 

The “thievery” of music through the use of technological advances and yet another new music format (mp3) came as a surprise to the music industry.

 

What is it they call corporations who do not pay attention to the ever-evolving market to which they sell? Ah yes. Stupid.

 

The proliferation of music in the mp3 format across the internet has done absolutely incredible things for an industry that had largely grown out of touch. The rise of the entire independent scene can attribute its success to the sharing of music. Word of mouth has never before been so fast, and with such easily accessible proof to back it up. Whether sending the songs to peers directly, or accessing them through sites such as myspace or New Music Canada, bands are getting music heard by people whom they could not have reached in the past. Music acts are finding success and validation that was never before available to them when the record labels ruled the industry. It is the democratization of music, and for music fans it has been a godsend.

 

There is the small matter of copyright to assess, and outlets such as the iTunes music store have deftly succeeded at that. As long as free downloads are available, there will be legalities to comprehend. Legalities that are so dense the industry is still sorting through them, while in the meantime the availability of legitimately free music has skyrocketed. As with any other product on the market, if you provide your customer with a good enough sample they will come back and purchase the whole package.

 

The industry’s real problem? They can’t spoon feed the public crap anymore.

 

The focus is back to albums, which can’t survive without talent. The industry has partly removed its head from its ass and made steps to join this trend. It is a long way from healthy, but it is by no means going extinct. Artists continue to make their money where they always have, through touring, while the industry looks for the next profit grab.

 

Everything will be ok.

 

File downloading was just the kick in the balls it needed to stop being such an asshole.

 

Return to Perspectives

 

 

Return to Front Page



 

 


Copyright © 2004-2007 The Window. All Rights Reserved.